Hi Ludovic, On Donnerstag, 9. Oktober 2014, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Holger, please stop tagging "jessie" packages that are not in testing.
I wasn't aware that I'm doing this, thanks for notifying!
> Additionally, the version of libaws referenced in #764268 is neither
> in jessie nor in sid. This is explained in the bug. Please do not
> ignore these explanations anymore.
ok
> This is the third time I've had to correct your mistake by hand and
> I'm getting tired of this.
How about you'd tell me immediatly?
I'm also quite tired of tagging 1-3 bugs so that they don't show up in the
list of release critical bugs affecting stable, which is what people see, when
they use "apt-listchanges" (so they dont get scary warnings about broken
packages which dont affect them) or people wanting to fix RC bugs in stable
also have a better overview, whats releveant. Thats why I do this, and a.) I
could use help with that and b.) people could tag+file bugs correctly in the
first place (that only applies to constant submitters who I understand are
busy+overworked them selves.)
According to my tool, "410 RC bugs affecting wheezy known to the BTS, 896
known to us." - IOW: I've look at 896 RC bugs affecting wheezy since its
release. And probably 300-400 I've assigned away not to clutter the views.
I'm sorry I make mistakes when doing so and have thus annoyed you... but I
hope you understand better now, why I do this. Mistakes happen.
Any idea what to do with 764268 then? Downgrade? Close?
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
