Your message dated Mon, 06 Oct 2014 13:52:42 +0200
with message-id
<1412596362.2230707.175610701.3356b...@webmail.messagingengine.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#763360: libjpeg-turbo is hijacking binaries from other
source packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #763360,
regarding libjpeg-turbo is hijacking binaries from other source packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
763360: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763360
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libjpeg-turbo
Version: 1:1.3.1-3
Severity: serious
Dear maintainers,
libjpeg-turbo is hijacking binaries from other source packages:
libjpeg-progs : provided by libjpeg8
libjpeg62 libjpeg62-dbg libjpeg62-dev: provided by libjpeg6b
Please correct this as soon as possible.
Cheers,
--
Bill. <[email protected]>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:1.3.1-4
My understanding is that this bug can be now closed as
the libjpeg-progs are not built from src:libjpeg-progs and
libjpeg62* binary package names has been accepted now.
Please reopen if I am mistaken.
libjpeg8 or libjpeg9 now needs to build libjpeg-progs with
epoch bumped to 2 (e.g. libjpeg9 2:9a-1 or libjpeg8 2:8d1-1).
Cheers,
Ondrej
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014, at 20:48, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 03:03:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > I hope we could leave it as that for the upload - nobody has a time
> > machine to undo the upload, but we could try to make it better now and
> > discuss where we should go.
>
> Ok, let's focus on libjpeg-progs, since I do not think there is a
> disagreement
> about it. What would you propose as a course of action that allow either
> libjpeg8 or lijpeg9 to provide libjpeg-progs with minimal disruption to
> the archive ?
>
> While libjpeg-progs 1:1.3.1-4 does not build libjpeg-progs, rmadison
> libjpeg-progs
> still report
> libjpeg-progs | 8d-1+deb7u1 | wheezy | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64,
> kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc
> libjpeg-progs | 1:1.3.1-3 | jessie | all
> libjpeg-progs | 1:1.3.1-3 | sid | all
>
> Thus somehow the offending binary package has not been removed from the
> archive.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Bill. <[email protected]>
>
> Imagine a large red swirl here.
>
--
Ondřej Surý <[email protected]>
Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server
--- End Message ---
