Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:04:44 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344859: selinux-policy-default: Unmet Dependencies
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 00:14:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 26 16:14:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from [209.9.232.198] (helo=valletta.ciziunas.com)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Er2U7-0003vC-61
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:14:35 -0800
Received: by valletta.ciziunas.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 2BAF525F22; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:15:02 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Vincas Ciziunas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: selinux-policy-default: Unmet Dependencies
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:15:02 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: selinux-policy-default
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
An attempt to install selinux-policy-default results in the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/linux# apt-get install selinux-policy-default
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
selinux-policy-default: Depends: libpam-modules (>= 0.77-0.se5) but 0.76-22
is to be installed
Depends: libselinux1 (>= 1.24-4) but 1.22-1 is to be
installed
PreDepends: policycoreutils (>= 1.24-2) but 1.22+0-2
is to be installed
PreDepends: checkpolicy (>= 1.24-2) but 1.22-2 is to
be installed
E: Broken packages
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (650, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.12-grsec-nomods
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 344859-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 01:04:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 26 17:04:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86]
helo=tennyson.dodds.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Er3Gi-0003pK-UU
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:04:49 -0800
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 26CFB7009; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:04:44 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:04:44 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Vincas Ciziunas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#344859: selinux-policy-default: Unmet Dependencies
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zx4FCpZtqtKETZ7O"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--zx4FCpZtqtKETZ7O
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 07:15:02PM -0500, Vincas Ciziunas wrote:
> Package: selinux-policy-default
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> An attempt to install selinux-policy-default results in the following:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/linux# apt-get install selinux-policy-default
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
> the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
> that package should be filed.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> selinux-policy-default: Depends: libpam-modules (>=3D 0.77-0.se5) but 0=
=2E76-22 is to be installed
> Depends: libselinux1 (>=3D 1.24-4) but 1.22-1 i=
s to be installed
> PreDepends: policycoreutils (>=3D 1.24-2) but 1=
=2E22+0-2 is to be installed
> PreDepends: checkpolicy (>=3D 1.24-2) but 1.22-=
2 is to be installed
> E: Broken packages
Either you have packages on hold that you should not, or this is a bug in
the amd64 archive; in either case, it's not a bug in the
selinux-policy-default package, whose dependencies are correct.
Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--zx4FCpZtqtKETZ7O
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDsJMsKN6ufymYLloRAvUHAKCwPtisKkbpMi/xRMkqGXQryYx7tQCgnlv2
eJ2Lpx471V/MKo62+YLJcP4=
=qbm6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--zx4FCpZtqtKETZ7O--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
