Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:17:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343065: fixed in pychm 0.8.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2005 11:09:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 12 03:09:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] 
helo=tennyson.dodds.net)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EllYL-0008D1-9b
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 03:09:09 -0800
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id E67EE7007; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 03:09:08 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 03:09:08 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pychm: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency on chmlib-dev
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+B+y8wtTXqdUj1xM"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--+B+y8wtTXqdUj1xM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: pychm
Version: 0.8.2-3
Severity: serious

Hi Carlos,

For some reason, the chmlib maintainer has changed the name of the
chmlib-dev package to libchm-dev.  This means pychm now fails to build in
unstable, as shown at
<http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=3Dpychm&arch=3Ds390&ver=3D0.8.2-3%2=
Bb1&stamp=3D1134377050&file=3Dlog>.

Also, for some reason python-chm is statically linked to chmlib on 10 of 11
architectures, but dynamically linked to it on s390.  You might want to
check why the package isn't dynamically linking in all cases, as expected.

Cheers,
--=20
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                   http://www.debian.org/

--+B+y8wtTXqdUj1xM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDnVpUKN6ufymYLloRArj8AJ9BhGFj4H/BShN//oDzrsHO4dHbRgCgoeWT
o+tWl/XW5csrZDXKhGyqCMQ=
=7uym
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--+B+y8wtTXqdUj1xM--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 343065-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Dec 2005 18:21:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 15 10:21:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EmxfC-0007gv-V7; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:17:10 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Carlos Z.F. Liu)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#343065: fixed in pychm 0.8.2-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:17:10 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: pychm
Source-Version: 0.8.2-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pychm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

pychm_0.8.2-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/pychm/pychm_0.8.2-4.diff.gz
pychm_0.8.2-4.dsc
  to pool/main/p/pychm/pychm_0.8.2-4.dsc
python-chm_0.8.2-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pychm/python-chm_0.8.2-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Carlos Z.F. Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated pychm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:16:10 +0800
Source: pychm
Binary: python-chm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Carlos Z.F. Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Carlos Z.F. Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 python-chm - Python binding for CHMLIB
Closes: 343065
Changes: 
 pychm (0.8.2-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Build-Depend on libchm-dev instead of chmlib-dev. (Closes: #343065)
   * bump Standards-Version to 3.6.2, no change needed.
   * debian/copyright : update FSF address.
   * debian/watch : updated
Files: 
 02f54642e08ad44adbdf8629c49ea1c0 612 python optional pychm_0.8.2-4.dsc
 e250504d3084b302e786a61e93e9d669 1995 python optional pychm_0.8.2-4.diff.gz
 7a139dd58eb3b8ecb42396c72b9998a5 25754 python optional 
python-chm_0.8.2-4_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDoa++K67kHwZE+rcRAiL2AKCAgM7VGjWn/sFvzEN5eSjnuAbalwCg2QuB
+4QdSN9FaP2B/Mo97kLStd8=
=0tTv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to