On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > > Hi, > > I noticed a similar complaint today - this time about gcc. > * I believe the performance of this check to be inadequate and a > disservice to Lintian's users. > - With (what remains of) my Lintian maintainer hat, I consider this > unsuitable for release. > * I intend to revert / disable the checks within 14 days if they have > not been improved considerable before then. > - My best efforts[1] has been an improvement, but I still find it no > where near acceptable performance. > > > The "files"-check of libgcj-doc in 2.5.22.1 has a runtime of 1356s - > that is 22 minutes! Even with our partial fix in the master branch, it > is /only/ reduced to 605s or ~10 minutes!
Ok what do you expect reasonable ? Bastien > For comparison, I have made this little table to show the impact since > 2.5.19 (the last version without the "privacy"-breaker tags): > > Wall-time Relative to 2.5.19 > master 21m 30s 216% > 2.5.22.1 36m 19s 364% > 2.5.19 9m 57s 100% > > ~Niels > > [1] commit 60dcea84c2d5bbc4c2eb98c1361700d6e2c97ca6 > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=lintian/lintian.git;a=commitdiff;h=60dcea84c2d5bbc4c2eb98c1361700d6e2c97ca6 > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
