On 2014-05-17 11:05:48, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Fri, 16 May 2014 15:52:04 Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > The problem is that tupi-data (= ${binary:Version})
> > appears in tupi's ${misc:Depends}.
>
> Thank you for excellent diagnosis. I believe this problem inherited from
> debhelper's #747141... Let's see what debhelper maintainers will say about
> this...No, I think this is not a bug in debhelper but a bug in tupi. With the current use of dh_installdocs --link-doc you loose the binNMU changelog entry. I'd rather have dh_installdocs error out if it's used that way on a combination of arch-indepdent and arch-dependent packages. I've filed #748376 against lintian to emit a warning if it dh_installdocs is used in that way. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
