Hi Bastian, On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Bastian Blank <bastian.bl...@credativ.de> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 06:10:16PM +0100, Janos Guljas wrote: >> Could you confirm that the buffer corruption is *NOT* fixed in the new >> upstream release 2.0.2 as it handles the offset parameter? > > Wrong question. The bug did not _ask_ for a new upstream version. This > is the only occurance you may close a bug this way. Everything else > looks like you closed them by error.
No bugs were closed by error, that is a false statement and malicious assumption. > > There were maintainers that closed bugs en-bulk this way because they did > not want to read them. New upstream release did fix this issue, which is marked in the changelog as such. There were no "en-bulk" bugs closed, especially not unread ones. > > The bug-fix was shipped as part of the new release, so add a new line > stating _what_ was fixed. > > Bastian Thank you for you contribution, Janos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
