Eric Lavarde <e...@lavar.de> writes:
> Hi,
hello Eric,
> Why not 3. Create a separate package with a recommend/suggest relation
> between both?
That's a good idea. Can I just let the new package
("freeplane-flash-browser") put the file in
"/usr/share/freeplane-flash-browser/visorFreeplane.swf",
and then create a symlink from
/usr/share/freeplane/resources/flash/visorFreeplane.swf to
/usr/share/freeplane-flash-browser/visorFreeplane.swf
in the freeplane package?
(it must be in /usr/share/freeplane/resources/... or in freeplaneeditor.jar)
--> @QA: is it ok to fix this with the upcoming 1.3.x release and leave
1.2.23-2 as is?
Thanks and Best Regards,
Felix
> Eric
>
> Felix Natter <fnat...@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> Felix Natter <fnat...@gmx.net> writes:
>
> hello Bastien,
>
> thanks for pointing this out.
>
> Can we keep the package (in main) until I fix this in Freeplane 1.3.x
> (will be released in a few months [1]), or do I need to fix it _right
> now_?
>
> [1] Then I would fix it cleanly and disable the Flash export
> upstream.
>
> I've talked to upstream and it turns out the source code is in another
> git repository:
> https://github.com/freeplane/misc/tree/master/flash-browser
>
> I see two solutions:
>
> 1. tell upstream to include the source (~300k) in all source packages
>
> 2. ZIP those files and include them as a Debian patch.
>
> (2) could easily be done for 1.2.23.
> Thanks and Best Regards,
>
> --
> Sent from my tablet. Please excuse my brevity.
>
--
Felix Natter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
