Hi Osamu, On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 12:38:10PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 02:57:32PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > > Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> If yes, you should use CJKbookmarks also for DVI files, as indicated > > >> above. If not (and I recommend that), simply do not load hyperref at > > >> all when producing dvi (unless you want to distribute DVI files, too). > > Hmmm... I am lost in LaTeX world. > > Current debiandoc-sgml has functionality to modify generated latex file > using messy but simple shell script called fixlatex. The default symple > one is in debiandoc-sgml but the most elaborate one is in > debian-reference.
Right. Please note that it was part of the package to work also in a old Woody environment. Since www-master was updated to Sarge we should remove ugly workarounds which where integrated into debiandoc-sgml. Nevertheless there were also a few package related fixes, such as Polish quotation style which is not FTBFS or debiandoc-sgml related. > As I reviewed this cutomized bin/fixlatex in debian-reference, I was > surprized how it grew so much. > > It looks like we can add this there. It would only be another hack. I reassigned the bug to debiandoc-sgml and prepare a new upload. But I first need a few hour to test it on all documents from DDP, in current testing and Sarge environment. Please upload when you see my commit to debiandoc-sgml CVS repository. > As I have been updating debiandoc-sgml, I can fix some bugs from here > too. (I have to be careful not to break previous work arounds.) > That is to fix files in tools/lib/Format in the source tree of > debiandoc-sgml and there is LaTeX.pm is good candidates. For this > issue, I do not know which is better. Right, LaTeX.pm is the correct file to patch. > My question is: > > Is this issue caused by other broken package? (it seems YES.) I assumed a problem in dvips with option -z. But since dvips just converts a dvi file to ps I understand that it requires a proper input file. Since -z option was introduced in 1.89 of debiandoc-sgml it was not well tested (I always try to test as much as possible, but it needs a very long time on my PIII 800 mini notebook). > Should all debiandoc-sgml based package get this fix? If a document was supported by the current debiandoc-sgml package there is no need to rebuild it or to change the build dependencies ... Jens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
