On 01/05/2014 03:49 PM, Roland Stigge wrote: > On 05/01/14 19:08, tony mancill wrote: >>> jblas FTBFS on most architectures since tests are enabled in >>> 1.2.0-5. E.g., on powerpc: >> >> Thanks for the bug report. I wonder if jblas actually functional >> at all on those architectures before this upload anyway. > > I can run individual test for you if you. Just tell.
Hi Roland, thanks for the offer. I'm currently using the s390x porter box, zelenka, which is at least enough to reproduce the test failure (and crash the JVM if I add the JNI .so to the LD_LIBRARY_PATH before running the upstream tests). I still wonder whether this package has ever been useful on non-i386/amd64 architectures. For the short-term, so the ruby transition can move forward, we could temporarily either disable to tests or constrain the architectures. Between those 2, I prefer the latter. Thoughts? Thank you, tony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
