Hi, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > This package FTBFS with perl 5.18 from experimental (in a clean sbuild > session): > > t/03-yaml.t .......... ok > make[1]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. > make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > make[1]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. > make: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > make: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. > Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity
Gregor forwarded this as https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=85999 -- nevertheless it looks quite a lot like a modern incarnation of https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40287 The failure seems to be always in t/04-fork.t, either after test 8 or after test 15. Sometimes the test also passes, so there seems to be some random part in it as described in https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40287 I seem to be able to reduce the probability for hanging (but not avoid it completely) if I comment out the lines _after_ "$output = slurp $testfile;" (i.e. the line where $output is first accessed) in those tests which included code references. You can easily output the return value of slurp before it returns it, but accessing it after slurp has ended, fails in approx. half of the cases. Replacing the included slurp implementation (in t/Util.pm) with the implementation of File::Slurp does not seem to make a difference. So far my findings. Didn't find a reliable solution, though. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
