Hi! On k, 2013-08-20 at 12:18 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Szalay Attila wrote: > > > > dh $@ --with autoreconf --fail-missing > > > > then dh will call all the helper scripts with -O--fail-missing. And > > dh_install does not like this. if I override the dh_install target and > > call the dh_install from it in it's normal way, then it works like a > > charm.
Maybe I wa not clear enough. In my package I worked around this problem with the following code: override_dh_install: dh_install --fail-missing > I don't see any similarity between that and bug #718121. You are asking > dh to pass --fail-missing on to dh_install, and the option is, > presumably, behaving as it's supposed to. Ok. I try to be more clear. dh_install -O--fail-missing do nothing. Not even saying that it will do nothing. In other way, dh_install --fail-missing copy files. Which is not a big suprise, because that is the job of the program. > Please avoid sending unrelated stuff to RC bug reports in the future. > Such bug reports are typically read by a lot of people, and adding such > noise makes them harder to follow. I do not thing that I sent unrelated thing. my problem is looking very similar. dh_install wasn't copy ANY files, when it's called trough the dh. Isn't this bug is about this? I know what --fail-missing is do. And I use it in the way it should be used. And I'm able to differentiate the error message about files left in the tmp area and when dh_install say it could find nothing. But - which is an other interesting thing - I could not reproduce the problem in my building machine. So I could not produce evidence. :( -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org