Le jeudi 25 avril 2013 à 19:47 +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit : > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 15:05:47 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > All packages shipping gconf schemas have a Depends on gconf2. It is > > generated via dh_gconf which adds "gconf2 (>= 2.28.1-2)" to misc:Depends. > > > > This version is already satisfied by gconf2 from squeeze. We could bump > > that and binNMU the rdeps. But then we'd have some arch:all rdeps (which > > would need sourceful uploads) and I'm actually not sure if a more > > tightened Depends actually ensures that the new gconf2 is unpacked > > before its rdeps. Does anyone know? > > > No way are we touching heaps of packages at this point. Either there's > an isolated fix in one package, or this issue gets a wheezy-ignore.
I think we only need to fix the packages: * that still have a dh_gconf prerm snippet in squeeze * AND that don’t have a prerm anymore in wheezy (or that haven’t been uploaded since squeeze). That might not represent too many packages. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
