Joachim Breitner wrote: > If you want to avoid cdbs, I’d be happy to see dh support Haskell, but > it should use the same building steps as haskell-devscripts now, I’d > think.
I don't know if it's worth putting in the time to make debhelper support haskell library packages, but it certianly makes sense for it to automatically handle packages that simply build binaries from a cabal file. I hope to see an increasing number of such packages in Debian. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
