On 15/12/12 07:51 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Ben Armstrong <[email protected]>, 2012-12-15, 16:15: >> In light of this policy, doesn't this mean gtypist is OK? Permission >> appears to be already granted to remove those cover texts: >> >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/12/msg00200.html > > As I understand it, this permission was given to _upstream_ maintainers > of GNU software. It could be wrong, though.
Hm, and even that is dubious. The wording is actually: "If your manual is not published by the FSF, and under 400 pages, you can omit both cover texts." gtypist is a GNU project, and gtypist.texi contains: Published by the Free Software Foundation @* 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @* Boston, MA 02110-1301 @* USA @* So I don't think this permission applies. The prospects for avoiding having to split the doc to a non-free package are looking bleak. Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
