On 2012-12-11 07:38:47 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > On 11/12/2012 00:23, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2012-12-10 20:44:08 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > >> Gcc plugin system sucks from a distribution point of view... > >> The best solution would be to rebuild dragonegg at installation time. > > > > How about adding dependencies? > > > > For instance, dragonegg-4.6 could depend on some fixed version > > of gcc-4.6. Or if you think that a dependency shouldn't be added > > there, it could be done for llvm-gcc-4.6; it currently has: > > > > Depends: dragonegg-4.6, gcc-4.6, g++-4.6 > > > > Using = dependencies would solve the problem. > No, it would not. > dragonegg even fails when built with gcc 4.7.2-12 (experimental) and > used with gcc 4.7.2-4 (unstable).
That's precisely why I suggest = dependencies: gcc 4.7.2-4 and a dragonegg-4.6 built with 4.7.2-12 couldn't be installed at the same time. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[email protected]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
