Rob Browning <[email protected]> writes: > > investigate our load-path handling more carefully, perhaps even more so, > given that Emacs has changed its behavior over the past couple of major > releases -- but I also think that it's probably not something that we > should attempt right now, this close to a release.
Ok. If took away the 24.2/site-lisp symlink as thought in the policy then I suppose the load-path would be cleaned up. Or if it was an actual directory instead of a symlink -- if that wasn't yet more confusing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
