On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 09:03:03 -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > On Thu, 22 Nov 2012, Julien Cristau wrote: > > >It does recommend it. > > > > It being perl or perl-modules? I think it ought to be the latter. > Makes no difference, there's a circular dep between the two. Also the perl-modules description says:
Note that this package only exists to save archive space and should be considered an internal implementation detail of the `perl' package. Other packages should not depend on `perl-modules' directly, they should use `perl' (which depends on `perl-modules') instead. Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
