-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:33:40AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 13:58 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:59:34PM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:55:25PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: > > > > I did a build-deps and and dpkg-buildpackage to make sure that I had > > > > all the > > > > build depens, but it seems as Ted said and I confirm that I needs the > > > > nvidia-glx-dev. > > > The Question is: why the package needs nvidia-glx-dev on amd64 and on > > > other > > > platforms it builds succesfully without nvidia-glx-dev?
> > Because of a longstanding bug in the nvidia lib package which creates a > > broken .so symlink when it's installed without nvidia-glx-dev as well. > Is this the same issue as in 272438? Yes, that's the same bug. > So should this be reassigned to nvidia-glx-dev? Uh, the build issue doesn't seem to have much to do with the reason for this bug report. - -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDZtvdKN6ufymYLloRAkL+AJ9XxSh2Pd5qRESx+/gRD98huTEyyQCgqzSq 0naitiNPEL10yjWAVOMUZhY= =9INz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
