On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 00:04:09 +0100 Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 00:47 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:19:07 +0100 Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] > > > m68k is not just "unofficial" or "not officially supported". It's not > > > been part of Debian, nor hosted on debian.org systems, since sarge was > > > archived. Debian is not distributing any packages on m68k and what > > > others might be doing on that architecture is not relevant to RC bugs in > > > Debian. > [...] > > I thought that ftp.debian-ports.org was an official Debian Project > > service for unsupported architectures [...] > > That's why I claimed that the Debian Project is still distributing > > gmsh/2.3.0.dfsg-1 built for the m68k architecture... > > To the best of my knowledge, debian-ports is not a Debian project > service.
Ah, then I stand corrected. Sorry for the noise: it was due to a misunderstanding on my side. I was probably misled by the fact that http://packages.debian.org/sid/gmsh also lists unofficial ports... Once again, sorry for polluting this bug report with irrelevant additional issues. Bye and thanks a lot for your kind explanations. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpgfa2osMi3p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
