reopen 684828 thanks On 25/08/12 at 19:11 -0400, David Prévot wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi Lucas, QA contributors, > > Le 14/08/2012 03:18, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > Source: backbone > […] > > Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64 > > > > Hi, > > > > During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to > > build on amd64. > […] > >> The following packages have unmet dependencies: > >> sbuild-build-depends-backbone-dummy : Depends: libnode-uglify but it is > >> not installable > >> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. > >> apt-get failed. > > Actually its an OR dependency: > > libnode-uglify | yui-compressor > > The package builds fine in a Wheezy amd64 pbuilder chroot (pulling > yui-compressor), thus closing the bug. I just wanted to put some light > on this issue: maybe the resolver used to perform the archive rebuild > could be improved to avoid this kind of false positive.
Hi, By default, sbuild ignores alternative build-dependencies (a | b) and only uses the first package. that is to ensure reproducible builds, and avoid situations where packages build against different b-deps on different architectures. So the bug is valid, and should be fixed in wheezy (and I'm not aware of the release team considering those failures non-RC). > I've tagged a few FTBFS on wheezy as unreproducible (because I didn't > investigate why it failed ten days ago, or because I couldn't find an > obvious reason), should I simply have closed them? Did you Cc me? I have very little time for Debian recently, but try to keep up with bugmail where I'm Cced. Anyway, a good way to make progress is usually to provide a build log, and a diff between my log and your log. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
