Hi Adam,
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:00:53PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 14:45 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > BTW, it seems to me that libpoco development only happens in experimental
> > and unstable does not deserve the attention it would need. Please help
> > fixing the problem to make sure the reverse depends can stay in testing.
>
> "Stay" would imply that they're currently _in_ testing.
Hmmm, you are right. It's kicked now obviosely - I somehow missed this
and this is quite disgusting. I really hope there would be a chance to get
this back - at least the bug remains also against wheezy ...
Thanks for the hint anyway
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
