Package: liblua5.1-0-dev
Version: 5.1.5-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Rebuilt opendkim 2.6.2-1 (current version in Wheezy/Sid) against the update
liblua5.1-0-dev.
* What was the outcome of this action?
The package FTBFS.
* What outcome did you expect instead?
I expected it to build with -3 like it does with -2. opendkim configure has
both a check for the lua headers and a lua version check. The former works
fine, but the latter now fails:
checking for Lua... /usr
checking Lua version... configure: error: Lua version 5.1 or later required
make: *** [config.status] Error 1
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
E: Failed autobuilding of package
The test in configure is simple:
#include <lua.h>
#if !defined(LUA_VERSION_NUM) || LUA_VERSION_NUM < 501
# error Lua version 5.1 or later is required
#endif
int
main()
{
return 0;
}
lua.h defines LUA_VERSION_NUM as 501, so presumably LUA_VERSION_NUM is not
getting defined properly (the include isn't picking up the header).
This is not a multi-arch package (and won't be for Wheezy).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: linux-image-3.2.0-3-686-pae (3.2.21-3) (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages liblua5.1-0-dev depends on:
ii libc6-dev [libc-dev] 2.13-34
ii liblua5.1-0 5.1.5-3
ii libreadline-dev 6.2-8
Versions of packages liblua5.1-0-dev recommends:
pn libtool <none>
pn pkg-config <none>
liblua5.1-0-dev suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
