Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2012 18:23:07 +0000
with message-id <1341080587.10000.22.camel@julia>
and subject line Re: Bug#677626: ceph - Unwarranted restriction of architectures
has caused the Debian Bug report #677626,
regarding ceph - Unwarranted restriction of architectures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
677626: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677626
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ceph
Version: 0.47.2-1
Severity: serious
The ceph upload in NEW tells:
| * Limit archs to build on as leveldb dependency doesn't support all.
The leveldb package is clearly not restricted to specific architectures,
so this is not allowed.
Bastian
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 16:12 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 07:16:21PM +0000, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 15:33 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > In my opinion, leveldb should be limited to
> > architectures that it builds on.
>
> Right now it is supposed to build on any arch. With #677645 in the way
> it does.
Sure, but it seems to be remain for Wheezy. No answer from upstream for
ten days now[2]. What I see ATM is that leveldb doesn't build on all
release architectures.
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 21:33 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 19:16 +0000, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 15:33 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > While I agree with this, I don't see the point how leveldb and ceph
> > will migrate to testing.
>
> The same way they always have? The requirement is that the package is
> up to date _on the architectures on which it has previously built_.
> Failure to build on architectures on which the package has never built
> is irrelevant.
This is right, but Ceph was built on all architectures before. Then
upstream added leveldb dependency and now Ceph can't be built
everywhere.
On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 19:40 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Unless this gets fixed we'll have to remove ceph from wheezy. Which
> means qemu and qemu-kvm need to drop their build-deps on ceph packages.
> They can always be re-added if/when leveldb/ceph are fixed. Cc:ing the
> qemu/qemu-kvm maintainers.
It was fixed before accepted from the NEW queue. Built on all
architectures where leveldb is built[1], except ia64. Closing this bug
now.
Julien, may you ask inside Google what's the status of #677645 [2]?
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ceph
[2] http://code.google.com/p/leveldb/issues/detail?id=84
--- End Message ---
