severity 678604 important tag 678604 help thanks On Sat, 23 Jun 2012, peter green wrote: > lilypond fails to build on armhf with the following error. > > >/build/buildd-lilypond_2.14.2-3-armhf-1MbTkJ/lilypond-2.14.2/scripts/build/out/gen-emmentaler-scripts > > --dir=./out > >cd ./out && /usr/bin/fontforge -script emmentaler-11.pe > >Copyright (c) 2000-2011 by George Williams. > >Executable based on sources from 23:14 GMT 25-Feb-2011-ML. > >Library based on sources from 13:48 GMT 22-Feb-2011. > >Cannot open > >/build/buildd-lilypond_2.14.2-3-armhf-1MbTkJ/lilypond-2.14.2/mf/out/feta11.pfb > >The requested file, feta11.pfb, does not exist > >MergeFonts: Can't find font: feta11.pfb > >Called from... > >emmentaler-11.pe: line 17 > >make[2]: *** [out/emmentaler-11.otf] Error 1 > >make[2]: Leaving directory > >`/build/buildd-lilypond_2.14.2-3-armhf-1MbTkJ/lilypond-2.14.2/mf' > >make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 > >make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 > > I diffed the armel and armhf build logs to see if I could narrow > down the problem and got to the following hunk (- is armel + is > armhf)
The problem is that metafont segfaults on armhf. This looks to be some odd kind of architecture specific problem in armhf's malloc, which I've asked for assistance with on debian-arm, but have received none.[1] Finally, please don't post the entire build log to the BTS. It's easily available from the buildd webpage (and in this case, is totally uniformative.) Don Armstrong 1: http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2012/05/msg00102.html -- [I]t's true that some of the most terrible things in the world are done by people who think, genuinely think, that they're doing it for the best, especially if there is some god involved. -- Terry Pratchett _Snuff_ p185 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
