On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Torsten Landschoff <t.landsch...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 06/04/2012 08:26 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> >> swig2.0 should be configured with default Java (default-jdk package). It >> currently uses gcj-jdk > > You are right. However, I fail to see how this renders the package unusable > as the SWIG generated code should be portable among different Java version. > > I think severity grave is a bit exaggerated here.
I thought this was a clear requirement, re-reading it: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/c208.html "Java packages should be built with default-jdk if possible." So there is a should and "if possible", how do you understand the statement ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
