clone 333040 -1 reassign -1 imlib11-dev retitle -1 imlib11-dev should not conflict with gdk-imlib1-dev because of gdk-imlib11-dev Provides severity -1 important thanks
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 03:44:13AM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 07:32:15PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > So the sum of this discussion for pixelize is that > > * The binary depends directly on libpng10-0, so it needs to be rebuilt. > > * It build-depends directly on imlib1-dev. This must be changed to > > imlib11-dev, > > so it needs a new upload doing that. > Thanks for the summary / reminder. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to be > as easy as it sounds. > pixelize requires both, imlib11-dev (for Imlib.h) and gdk-imlib11-dev > (for gdk_imlib.h). I cannot install both, though: > --- > $ apt-get install imlib11-dev gdk-imlib11-dev > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree... Done > imlib11-dev is already the newest version. > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > or been moved out of Incoming. > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > imlib11-dev: Conflicts: gdk-imlib1-dev > E: Broken packages > --- > What can I do? Oh, bugger. Yes, this is a problem with imlib11-dev; it shouldn't conflict with gdk-imlib1-dev anymore, because gdk-imlib11-dev (from the same source package) *provides* gdk-imlib1-dev. This detail was probably overlooked when gdk-imlib1 was being reintroduced. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
