Your message dated Tue, 03 Apr 2012 07:20:22 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#666975: emacs23: I confirm this bug here
has caused the Debian Bug report #666975,
regarding emacs23: I confirm this bug here
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
666975: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666975
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: emacs23
Version: 23.4+1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I confirm this bug here!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages emacs23 depends on:
ii emacs23-bin-common 23.4+1-2
ii gconf-service 3.2.3-4
ii libasound2 1.0.25-2
ii libatk1.0-0 2.4.0-2
ii libc6 2.13-27
ii libcairo2 1.12.0-2
ii libdbus-1-3 1.5.12-1
ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-3.1
ii libfreetype6 2.4.9-1
ii libgconf-2-4 3.2.3-4
ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.26.0-2
ii libgif4 4.1.6-9
ii libglib2.0-0 2.32.0-3
ii libgpm2 1.20.4-4
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.10-1
ii libice6 2:1.0.7-2
ii libjpeg8 8d-1
ii libm17n-0 1.6.3-1
ii libncurses5 5.9-5
ii libotf0 0.9.12-1
ii libpango1.0-0 1.30.0-1
ii libpng12-0 1.2.47-2
ii librsvg2-2 2.36.0-5
ii libsm6 2:1.2.0-2
ii libtiff4 3.9.6-1
ii libtinfo5 5.9-5
ii libx11-6 2:1.4.4-4
ii libxft2 2.2.0-3
ii libxpm4 1:3.5.9-4
ii libxrender1 1:0.9.6-2
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.6.dfsg-2
emacs23 recommends no packages.
Versions of packages emacs23 suggests:
pn emacs23-common-non-dfsg <none>
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 04/03/2012 03:43 AM, Marcelo Luiz de Laia wrote:
>
> I confirm this bug here!
>
Thanks for your bugreport! Next time, please read carefully
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting before submitting a bugreport and
particularly the “The body of the report” section.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--- End Message ---
