Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2012 11:00:45 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#662048: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #569485,
regarding stage: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency: libplayercore2-dev (>= 
2.1.0)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
569485: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569485
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: stage
Version: 2.1.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [email protected]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100211 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

>From Edos:
stage (= 2.1.1-1): FAILED
  stage (= 2.1.1-1) build-depends on missing:
  - libplayercore2-dev (>= 2.1.0)

Relevant part:
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), autotools-dev, libplayercore2-dev (>= 
> 2.1.0), libplayerc2-dev (>= 2.1.0), libgtk2.0-dev, libltdl3-dev, 
> libjpeg62-dev, dpatch, doxygen, graphviz, libraw1394-dev
> 
> ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
> │ Install build dependencies                                                  
>  │
> └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
> 
> Checking for already installed source dependencies...
> debhelper: missing
> Using default version 7.4.13
> autotools-dev: missing
> libplayercore2-dev: missing
> Default version of libplayercore2-dev not sufficient, no suitable version 
> found. Skipping for now, maybe there are alternatives.
> libplayerc2-dev: missing
> Default version of libplayerc2-dev not sufficient, no suitable version found. 
> Skipping for now, maybe there are alternatives.
> libgtk2.0-dev: missing
> libltdl3-dev: missing
> libjpeg62-dev: missing
> dpatch: missing
> doxygen: missing
> graphviz: missing
> libraw1394-dev: missing
> Checking for source dependency conflicts...
> E: Broken packages
> Installing positive dependencies: debhelper autotools-dev libplayercore2-dev 
> libplayerc2-dev libgtk2.0-dev libltdl3-dev libjpeg62-dev dpatch doxygen 
> graphviz libraw1394-dev
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Reading state information...
> Note, selecting libltdl-dev instead of libltdl3-dev
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> 
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>   libplayerc2-dev: Depends: libplayerc2 but it is not going to be installed
>                    Depends: libplayerxdr2-dev but it is not going to be 
> installed
>   libplayercore2-dev: Depends: libplayercore2 but it is not going to be 
> installed
>                       Depends: libplayererror2-dev but it is not going to be 
> installed
> E: Broken packages

The full build log is available from:
   http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/02/11/stage_2.1.1-1_lsid64.buildlog

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot.  Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.

-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [email protected]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [email protected]             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.1.1-1+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package stage has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/662048

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[email protected].

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joerg Jaspert (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to