Your message dated Tue, 08 Nov 2011 17:03:51 +0000
with message-id <e1rnp5t-0004qy...@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#634637: fixed in tuxpuck 0.8.2-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #634637,
regarding tuxpuck: Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not libjpeg62-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
634637: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634637
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: tuxpuck
Version: 0.8.2-2.1
Severity: important

Hello Sven,

We are transitionning from libjpeg62 to libjpeg8.
As mentionned on debian-devel-announce[1], please update tuxpuck to
Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev instead of libjpeg62-dev.

The following Build-Depends was found:

tuxpuck         :Build-Depends: libjpeg62-dev 

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2010/02/msg00006.html

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <ballo...@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: tuxpuck
Source-Version: 0.8.2-2.2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tuxpuck, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

tuxpuck_0.8.2-2.2.diff.gz
  to main/t/tuxpuck/tuxpuck_0.8.2-2.2.diff.gz
tuxpuck_0.8.2-2.2.dsc
  to main/t/tuxpuck/tuxpuck_0.8.2-2.2.dsc
tuxpuck_0.8.2-2.2_i386.deb
  to main/t/tuxpuck/tuxpuck_0.8.2-2.2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 634...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
gregor herrmann <gre...@debian.org> (supplier of updated tuxpuck package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 17:30:35 +0100
Source: tuxpuck
Binary: tuxpuck
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.2-2.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Velt <s...@velt.de>
Changed-By: gregor herrmann <gre...@debian.org>
Description: 
 tuxpuck    - "Shufflepuck Cafe" Clone
Closes: 634637
Changes: 
 tuxpuck (0.8.2-2.2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Fix "Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not libjpeg62-dev":
     do as the bug report requests.
     (Closes: #634637)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 32860908aa3545057b041577a91fa00f4ef79dbd 1741 tuxpuck_0.8.2-2.2.dsc
 25e7b2cd4b372a8e5e5169e4faa5faa27dec1517 3377 tuxpuck_0.8.2-2.2.diff.gz
 4095c2f29bfa402e6ce9cd50ed54dda82e14b59b 327926 tuxpuck_0.8.2-2.2_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 2fe65909d1b8cd504cdf5c3173ef1e84df2a43be2d2824b3621f7d2385a23fda 1741 
tuxpuck_0.8.2-2.2.dsc
 c803db9a1437364ea5f772b4df1d66bd8b1f4e55997adc123d8dc6d3e25caf2b 3377 
tuxpuck_0.8.2-2.2.diff.gz
 398446e811e16a00e0153f8066f62be71ef1527e9ccfd63415b7d56a59eb46fd 327926 
tuxpuck_0.8.2-2.2_i386.deb
Files: 
 0a8744bf21701e867260d75e227e2a86 1741 games optional tuxpuck_0.8.2-2.2.dsc
 ae6ba7d1b29e4cdd1fb71eb617004c51 3377 games optional tuxpuck_0.8.2-2.2.diff.gz
 8979405b9c6ec18d2922fd8e433cdb53 327926 games optional 
tuxpuck_0.8.2-2.2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=YS3W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---

Reply via email to