Hi alltogether! On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:52:07PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > clone 330604 -1 > reassign -1 gcc-4.0 > severity -1 important > retitle -1 [alpha] insane default of -mno-ieee instead of -mieee breaks many > apps > thanks > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 09:17:01PM +0200, Torsten Zirzlaff wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Wolfram Quester wrote: > > > >Hi Torsten, > > > > > [...] > > > > > >Since you are using alpha, this is probably a reintroduction of 64Bit > > >uncleanliness in inkscape. Hm, I hoped that this would be closed. > > >Can you provide a backtrace please? I had a look at the buildlog for > > >inkscape on alpha, but there are so many warnings that I'm lost. > > > Hm, sicher kann ich einen backtrace machen. Nur die Frage was für eine > > Art von Backtrace? Im Anhang ein Backtrace aus dem gdb gestartet. > > Vielleicht einfach mal mit -mieee übersetzen. > > > Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception. > > [Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 1928)] > > 0x00000001204db62c in Shape::initialiseEdgeData () > > Yes, gcc-4.0 changed the default compilation options on alpha from -mieee to > -mno-ieee. Again. This is incredibly stupid, nobody in their right mind > actually *wants* -mno-ieee for general-purpose code and it's not a sane > default. Several other packages have already failed on alpha as a result of > this when built with gcc-4.0. > > I'm cloning this bug to the gcc-4.0 package; I hope Matthias will be able to > persuade upstream to apply sane default flags on alpha, or at least > reintroduce the patch that was used to fix bug #212912 in gcc-3.3.
Thanks for all your help, I'll workaround this bug by compiling with -mieee on alpha in the next upload. With best wishes, Wolfi > > -- > Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS > Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ So Steve, you aren't a postmodern programmer anymore?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
