Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> Perhaps the ppc64 detection is broken, and so something wrong is >> >> The ppc64 detection is not broken. It has been tested by the >> ppc64 porters. > > It sounded to me like Thomas was just suggesting that the ppc64 patch > might be causing configure to accidentally return a false positive on > ppc32 machines, not that it was doing anything wrong on ppc64 > machines, or is that how you read him too?
OK. > In any case, it seems like trying to build on a ppc32 host with the > ppc64 patch temporarily omitted will at least let us know if that > alleviates the segfault. I'll take care of this. I have the necessary hardware for testing. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant
