On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 04:18:57PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Lovely! But I've just upgraded, and still can't get find locally > > > which follows this syntax. Is this change final?
> > I don't understand. You're saying that findutils on your system doesn't > > respect the -perm /u+x syntax? What version of findutils do you have > > installed? > Yes, fresh apt-get install this morning: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/fix/t1/camm/debian/lam/lam-7.1.1$ find -name lamclean > -perm +u+x > ./otb/lamclean > ./otb/lamclean/lamclean > ./debian/static/usr/lib/lam/bin/lamclean > ./debian/shared/usr/lib/lam/bin/lamclean > ./debian/lam-runtime/usr/bin/lamclean > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/fix/t1/camm/debian/lam/lam-7.1.1$ find -name lamclean > -perm /u+x > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/fix/t1/camm/debian/lam/lam-7.1.1$ dpkg -l findutils > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed > |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: > uppercase=bad) > ||/ Name Version Description > +++-=====================-=====================-========================================================== > ii findutils 4.2.24-1 utilities for finding > files--find, xargs, and locate > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/fix/t1/camm/debian/lam/lam-7.1.1$ Then you're installing from a broken mirror. The current version of findutils in testing and unstable is 4.2.25-1. Since 4.2.24-1 doesn't support the / syntax (<sigh>), you'll want to add a versioned build-dependency in the process of fixing this... -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
