Your message dated Sun, 25 Sep 2005 16:01:12 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Sep 2005 12:18:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 25 05:18:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from house.nirmalvihar.info (emit.local) [61.17.90.7] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EJVSx-0008G0-00; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 05:18:48 -0700
Received: (qmail 16030 invoked by uid 1000); 25 Sep 2005 17:50:31 +0530
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: cogito is too much fun
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 17:50:31 +0530
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: cogito
Version: 0.12.1+20050730-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss

I've used CVS, perforce, and subversion.  Cogito is lightyears ahead.
It's so much fun to use that I am tempted to file silly bug reports
instead of concentrating on the work I should be doing.  Keep up the
great work!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-b1
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8

Versions of packages cogito depends on:
ii  curl                          7.14.0-5   Get a file from an HTTP, HTTPS, FT
ii  libc6                         2.3.5-3    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcurl3                      7.13.2-2   Multi-protocol file transfer libra
ii  libssl0.9.7                   0.9.7c-4   SSL shared libraries
ii  patch                         2.5.9-2    Apply a diff file to an original
ii  rcs                           5.7-15     The GNU Revision Control System
ii  rsync                         2.5.5-0.2  fast remote file copy program (lik
ii  ssh                           1:4.1p1-6  Secure shell client and server (tr
ii  wget                          1.8.1-6    retrieves files from the web
ii  zlib1g                        1:1.2.2-8  compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 330031-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Sep 2005 19:01:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 25 12:01:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.202] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EJbkt-0003d9-00; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 12:01:43 -0700
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 16so202382nzp
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 12:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
        
b=XE66bxOMmC7YLIG2KXTpwaBd8MuNMSxtBsIBGHuGFQCD1rIEd16n/xCiMWDPxbdo47X/c9yomRcjv+xJE258mWDJ7Ht6dUePNxPmPPMpcEotFYQScvDn/NUZ21bwrs7riGpTF24CUX4vbqljosB0Oh6HcDpimOD5/TFjj789hYU=
Received: by 10.36.252.54 with SMTP id z54mr816471nzh;
        Sun, 25 Sep 2005 12:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.89.15 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 12:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 16:01:12 -0300
From: "Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Not a bug
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hi!

I am closing this bug since it's really not a bug.
Also, it's not good to fill bugs with severuty set to "grave" just to
say that you like the program, right? :-)

Cheers,
Nelson


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to