Your message dated Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:36:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Dec 2004 13:54:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 30 05:54:25 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from d020125.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.20.125]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ck0ky-0004UY-00; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 05:54:25 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Ck0qC-0001jj-Uj; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:59:48 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: nvclock: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0):
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:59:48 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: nvclock
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When building 'nvclock' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:
gcc -DXTHREADS -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include
-I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0
-I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include
-I../backend -c -o callbacks.o callbacks.c
callbacks.c: In function 'error':
callbacks.c:56: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function
'exit'
callbacks.c: In function 'update_info':
callbacks.c:200: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
callbacks.c:201: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
callbacks.c:202: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
callbacks.c:208: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
callbacks.c:209: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
callbacks.c:210: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
callbacks.c: In function 'change_cards':
callbacks.c:343: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in
function 'strlen'
make[3]: *** [callbacks.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/nvclock-0.7/src/gtk'
With the attached patch 'nvclock' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/nvclock-0.7/src/gtk/callbacks.c ./src/gtk/callbacks.c
--- ../tmp-orig/nvclock-0.7/src/gtk/callbacks.c 2003-06-29 14:28:46.000000000
+0200
+++ ./src/gtk/callbacks.c 2004-12-30 14:45:06.771441896 +0100
@@ -197,17 +197,17 @@
nvclk = nv_card.get_gpu_speed();
text = g_strdup_printf("%0.3f", memclk);
- (gint)GTK_ADJUSTMENT(value_mem)->lower = nv_card.memclk_min;
- (gint)GTK_ADJUSTMENT(value_mem)->upper = nv_card.memclk_max;
- (gint)GTK_ADJUSTMENT(value_mem)->value = (memclk);
+ GTK_ADJUSTMENT(value_mem)->lower = nv_card.memclk_min;
+ GTK_ADJUSTMENT(value_mem)->upper = nv_card.memclk_max;
+ GTK_ADJUSTMENT(value_mem)->value = (memclk);
gtk_adjustment_set_value(GTK_ADJUSTMENT(value_mem), memclk);
gtk_entry_set_text(GTK_ENTRY(entry_mem), text);
g_free(text);
text = g_strdup_printf("%0.3f", nvclk);
- (gint)GTK_ADJUSTMENT(value_core)->lower = nv_card.nvclk_min;
- (gint)GTK_ADJUSTMENT(value_core)->upper = nv_card.nvclk_max;
- (gint)GTK_ADJUSTMENT(value_core)->value = (nvclk);
+ GTK_ADJUSTMENT(value_core)->lower = nv_card.nvclk_min;
+ GTK_ADJUSTMENT(value_core)->upper = nv_card.nvclk_max;
+ GTK_ADJUSTMENT(value_core)->value = (nvclk);
gtk_adjustment_set_value(GTK_ADJUSTMENT(value_core), nvclk);
gtk_entry_set_text(GTK_ENTRY(entry_core), text);
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 287843-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2005 20:37:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 23 13:37:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from clump.bawx.ca (bawx.ca) [64.251.30.168] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EIuI5-0001Ss-00; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:37:05 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.bawx.ca [127.0.0.1])
by bawx.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF99E90361
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bawx.ca ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (clump.bawx.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with SMTP id 29173-03 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from juliet.khensu.org (S0106000102c87780.pk.shawcable.net
[70.66.129.86])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "juliet.khensu.org", Issuer "The Donalds CA" (verified OK))
by bawx.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2622E90360
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by juliet.khensu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 327AA6C0AE; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: closing
From: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:36:46 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-maia-1.0.0-rc5 (Debian) at bawx.ca
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
no longer applicable in new version.
--
--------------------------------------------
Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.khensu.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB
--------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]