On Apr 26, Damien Wyart <damien.wy...@free.fr> wrote: > May I ask how you guessed that my problem could be related to this? With devtmpfs, devices are created earlier.
> I thought udev creating a tmpfs for /dev when devtmpfs is not enabled > was not affecting its subsequent behaviour. Indeed. This is why you should figure out why not using devtmpfs breaks your system. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
