On Apr 26, rleigh <rle...@codelibre.net> wrote: > > -mount -t tmpfs -o nodev,noexec,nosuid,mode=0755 none /run > > +mount -t tmpfs -o "nosuid,size=20%,mode=0755" tmpfs /run Why does /run should not be noexec?
> I've added the block above because we can't make an upload of sysvinit/ > initscripts to unstable until we have an updated initramfs-tools in > unstable, or else udev will break. Therefore in order to have a smooth Yes, if /run exists in the initramfs then it needs to be moved to the root filesystem. > Marco, have you tested this upgrade path? That is /run in the > initramfs and no /run on the rootfs? Is udev checking for that and No, but if the database is not copied to the initramfs then LVM will be annoyed. > not using /run in this scenario (or moving the files from /run to > /dev/.udev)? We will need to cope with this for a brief transitional > period when initramfs-tools is updated and initscripts is not. The udev initscript cannot know if there was a /run/udev in the initramfs and it was lost. Right now I can't see how to work around this. If there is no /run in the initramfs then /dev/.udev/ will be used, and since udev 167-3 the udev init script will move it to /run/udev/ (as long as /run is a mount point, check the init script). -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
