On Apr 12, Christian Ohm <chr....@gmx.net> wrote: > Possibly this is the same problem as in #621036, except that is marked as > being > fixed in 167-2, which didn't work here. Then looks like you will have to find out why, because so far it is working for everybody else. Do you have a run? Is it a tmpfs? Does it contain anything?
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
