On Sa, 2011-03-12 at 13:49 +0000, David Bremner wrote: > 1) Let syncevolution be removed from testing (this is policy for > packages that won't rebuild from source). [...] Realistically this interval > will probably be > the time until you bless a release as stable, plus a few weeks. > > 2) Push the pre-release 1.1.99.3 into testing. I can fix the library > version dependencies, but the other rough edges to the upgrade process > would remain. And of course, it is a pre-release version. > > Do you have a preference for which option I choose?
I suggest that we go for option 1 in the short term (because 1.1.99.3 still has some known issues and does not automatically migrate configs) and keep this time interval as short as possible. Let me check the remaining open issues and goals for 1.2, then I will set up a release schedule. If I am happy enough about the current state, then I could release 1.1.99.4 as a release candidate soonish (within a week or two), with automatic migration enabled, and that could go into unstable/testing. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
