On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 02:16:51PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:07:09PM +0100, Harald Jenny wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 08:59:41PM +0200, Teodor MICU wrote: > > > 2011/1/24 Harald Jenny <har...@a-little-linux-box.at>: > > > > Ok although the PIDFILE line can be removed with the below code. > > > > > > I'm don't see where PIDFILE is removed. > > > > Just take a look at the next patch version. > > It looks OK to me too, with the grain of salt of not being an amavis user.
:-) no problem > > > Well I don't think this package will make it into Debian Squeeze as for > > me a prerequisite is a fixed libmilter version... > > Reading debian-release, seems that there is no consensus about removing > amavisd-milter from squeeze. Well consensus may be nice to be achieved but not a necessity. > If you tested things carefully and everything > was OK, I'd say upload. I still have to do some tests yet. > That should not make things worse that before, but > better, starting real life check. Yes but before I will have to clean my old release branch which was rejected. > > And release team can still remove amavisd-milter from squeeze if needed. True yes > > If a fixed libmilter version is a pre-requisite for this particular bug > report, do not forget to set the corresponding blocker in the BTS. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=527862 this bug is already fixed in Debian unstable but there was no request from the maintainer to unblock it in time so the only method would be a t-p-u which I proposed about three weeks ago. > > > sorry when I kept you from doing other more release-critical work, this > > was not my intention :-(. > > No problem. Thanks very much for your help! > > Regards, > > -- > Agustin Kind regards Harald > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
