On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:41:36PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 09:38:30AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 05:04:02PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > do you plan on NMUing pbuilder for this bug? > > > > No, I don't consider it appropriate to NMU for an RC bug that I raised the > > severity on, withouth the acknowledgement of the maintainer that the > > severity is justified. Someone else NMUing is a vote that the severity is > > justified. > > The original submitter agreed with you on the severity. That's good > enough for me. > > I can do the upload if you like.
That'd be good. > However, I'm confused by your > message of 2010-12-17, where you said "Patch 5 in a series:". I'm > confused because I can see only one patch prior to this, and the later > patch seems to be a patch on the original patch. Can you > confirm whether the following is the intended change or whether > there are 4 other patches I'm missing. Sorry about the confusion. My local branch for this bug, 542915 in http://github.com/mpalmer/pbuilder, has three other patches in it (to auto-unmount everything, rename mountproc to mountall, and improve an error message), and so the other patch I attached to this bug report is #5 in that series. To clarify, the two patches that needed to fix this bug are: 0001-Ensure-that-nothing-is-still-mounted-before-deleting.patch 0005-Robustify-the-is-anything-mounted-check.patch The other three patches in the series are refactorings/improvements, and should not (IMHO) be made as part of an NMU. - Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
