On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:54:52 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:43:56PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: > >If I'm reading this discussion right, you expect someone else to apply > >the attached patches and then assume responsibility for the entire > >package since you're unwilling maintain it if it has any more patches? > > That seems a bit extreme, but I will take a look at doing so when I > >find some time. > > Do you consider joining the ghostscript team? That'd be great! > > > >It looks like the release team won't be accepting the version in > >experimental due to the rather large diff. > > One way to find out is by asking them. > > My plan is to ask when I have a package that works - i.e. fix bug#575798 > (and disable FAPI again, to closer match earlier release). But since > your plan is different, I suggest you ask _now_, before you spend time > on keeping the massively patched old release, if the release team might > consider approving the newer release wich includes upstream maintainance > of those same patches.
Just curious why you haven't asked them yourself yet? It is your package after all. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
