DBTS> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
>> reopen 603677
>> thanks

DBTS> If a maintainer closes a bug, and after a single round of explanation,
DBTS> still does not agree with reopening the bug, the bug should stay
DBTS> closed.

Julien isn't maintainer. [1]


DBTS> If you disagree with the maintainer, then your choices are to either
DBTS> attempt to:

DBTS> 1) convince the maintainer that your viewpoint is correct, preferably
DBTS> by submitting a patch which fixes the perceived problem, along with
DBTS> rationale as to why the patch is correct.

Maintainer hasn't appeared here yet. [1]

I think that Julien wants to RCs were closed and he ignores that the
problem is still present. I watch such DD's behaviour each debian
freeze.

The problem is still reproducible. So or this or 550650 (was done 11
Oct) or the other RC must be open (for ex against buildd), but You
(You and Julien) prefer to keep your eyes closed. It's a pity.

DBTS> 2) attempt to convince the technical committee that the maintainer is
DBTS> incorrect, and should be overridden. This necessitates a patch as
DBTS> required for #1.

He isn't maintainer.

DBTS> In neither case should you reopen bugs that a maintainer has
DBTS> closed.[1]

Maintainer didn't close the bug.


1. nbw:[~]$ apt-cache show jabberd14|grep ^Maintainer 
Maintainer: Miguel Landaeta <mig...@miguel.cc>
-- 
... mpd is off

. ''`.                               Dmitry E. Oboukhov
: :’  :   email: un...@debian.org jabber://un...@uvw.ru
`. `~’              GPGKey: 1024D / F8E26537 2006-11-21
  `- 1B23 D4F8 8EC0 D902 0555  E438 AB8C 00CF F8E2 6537

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to