reassign 603068 piuparts # taking the bug back until its clear where its from thanks
Hi Frank,
On Mittwoch, 10. November 2010, Frank Küster wrote:
> I cannot reproduce this in a sid chroot on i386.
I've been using squeeze here...
> Why 2.06? 2.07 was uploaded to sid in February, 2.08 in June.
that test seems to have been done some time ago, I can see that tex-common
2.08 is in squeeze at the moment. I'm not convinced this is the cause, but
let me reschedule those tests...
I'll come back to this bug in a few days, I've set a timer for me :)
> On your system, dpkg-query says
>
> No packages found matching texlive-base.
>
> which should be on stderr which is supposed to be discarded (an if it
> was on stdout, it would end up in the stat variable anyway).
stderr and stdout are both collected in those logs.
> Irrespective of whether tex-common has a bug, all those packages are
> probably buggy, since it seems they depend on texlive-binaries. This
> package does not provide any functionality to outsiders. Only with
> texlive-base can they expect anything usable.
hmmmm:
$ apt-cache rdepends texlive-binaries
texlive-binaries
Reverse Depends:
xmltex
|xdvik-ja
texlive-lang-polish
texlive-lang-indic
texlive-lang-greek
texlive-lang-czechslovak
texlive-lang-cyrillic
texlive-science
texlive-pstricks
texlive-math-extra
texlive-latex-extra
texlive-formats-extra
texlive-font-utils
texlive-extra-utils
texlive-xetex
texlive-pictures
texlive-omega
texlive-metapost
texlive-latex-recommended
texlive-latex-base
texlive-full
texlive-common
texlive-base
|multex-bin
|jtex-bin
pybtex
ptex-bin
jmpost
ocamlweb
musixtex
|multex-base
liblatex-driver-perl
latex209-base
okular
|jtex-base
|jlatex209-base
dvipsk-ja
cxref
cxref-doc
context
(again, in squeeze)
Should we file more bugs?
cheers & thanks so far,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
