On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 09:40:22AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> On 10/23/2010 06:45 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 22:58:28 -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> >
> >> Notification that an NMU addressing this bug has been uploaded to
> >> delayed/2. Please contact me if there is a pending maintainer upload
> >> and the NMU should be removed from the queue.
> >>
> > Please don't sponsor NMUs without reading the bug log and the patch.
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Julien
>
> Hi Julien,
>
> I did read the bug log and the patch. First, there are updates to the bug
> report *after* Jon acknowledged the NMU would be okay. You seem to expect the
> NMU operation to be completely atomic with respect to the bug report.
> However,
> the notification of the NMU being uploaded to delayed was sent on the 19th, so
> there was plenty of time for you to respond before the package entered the
> archive. I welcome your feedback, but there's nothing to prevent you from
> preparing a subsequent NMU, nor was there nothing preventing you from
> indicating
> that the NMU should be pulled from the queue.
Jon,
So far this has only been fixed in unstable, but we also need a
targeted fix for testing/Squeeze, see the mail below from a release
manager.
Cheers,
Moritz
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: linux.debian.devel.release
From: Julien Cristau
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 15:20:01 +0200
Subject: Re: Security unblock requests
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 14:37:20 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> More unblock requests:
> ust/0.7-2.1 -> CVE-2010-3386
52 files changed, 3116 insertions(+), 1232 deletions(-)
I'd prefer a targetted tpu fix rather than a new upstream.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
