reopen 601657 thanks On 2010/10/28 11:08, Adrian Knoth <a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 09:31:48AM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote: > > > The attached test program can trigger a (timing?) bug in libffado2, > > Welcome to userlevel device drivers. For some reasons, the packets were > not delivered or received in time. > > Might be a combination of period-size (lower is sometimes better), > firewire controllers and so on. > > As always, svn trunk might have a fix if it's really a device specific > error, i.e. misunderstanding of the samplerate in use. > > > ERROR: messagebuffer not initialized: 1250338856611: [31mWarning > > (ffado.cpp)[ 121] ffado_streaming_init: Realtime scheduling is not > > enabled. This will cause significant reliability issues. > > You're running it without realtime priorities? Now I see why you get > the timing issues mentioned above.
You seem to be misunderstanding the problem here. This is not about a buffer xrun because the application didn't submit enough PCM samples in time; this is about a crash due to an assertion failure, i.e. a bug in libffado2. Please do not close this bug report until there is a new Debian revision which does not crash (or until there is evidence that my test program is bugged, indirectly causing the crash). Max -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
