On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 at 00:34:44 -0400, Raphael Geissert wrote: > witty ships a swf file but does not build it from source.
I have a repository at http://git.debian.org/?p=users/smcv/qa/witty.git with some fixes for that; feel free to use them. (I'm not going to NMU or sponsor this package myself, because I have no idea how to test it...) Pau, I notice you've packaged version 3.1.5, but at this stage in the release process (squeeze has been frozen since August) it's best to stick to minimal fixes for RC bugs when uploading to unstable. You could upload 3.1.5 to experimental in the meantime, though. On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 at 16:56:25 +0100, Marcos Marado wrote: > The source package has > ./resources/WtSoundManager.swf > which is the result of the compilation of > ./src/flash/WtSoundManager.as > , so the only thing needed is to take off the swf file, and put the > instalation process to use haxe or mtasc to generate it... Indeed. Using the mtasc command line mentioned in a comment in the source produces a byte-for-byte identical .swf file, so that's easy enough: http://git.debian.org/?p=users/smcv/qa/witty.git;a=commitdiff;h=ea4f1e06b660a068b63c28eb61bc7183fa1f0038 I also noticed that resources/swfobject.js is in a minified form which I don't think really qualifies as source code; it's also not mentioned in debian/copyright, which is certainly a Policy violation. It turns out to be the result of putting the SWFObject 2.2 source file through yui-compressor, then deleting a couple of trailing spaces, so I'd be inclined to ship the non-minified version and put it through yui-compressor at build time: http://git.debian.org/?p=users/smcv/qa/witty.git;a=commitdiff;h=b0d6f10a2a80285c93ecec8061d42d46a49aa283 I'm not entirely happy about that second commit, because it doesn't actually give a copyright statement for SWFObject; I couldn't find one in swfobject_2_2.zip or on <http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/>. http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/wiki/history suggests that the copyright holders probably include at least Geoff Stearns, Bobby van der Sluis, Michael Williams, Aran Rhee, Philip Hutchison and Kyle Simpson. Several other Debian packages include SWFObject, so it'd probably be best in the long term to have it packaged in its own right: I opened http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601160 for that. Regards, smcv -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
