Dear Jonas, >>and that it will not be rudely and wrongly closed like #583183 was in >>http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=91;bug=583183 > > I disagree that the mass-filed bug was wrongly or rudely closed.
Hmm... Maybe the closer could have had the courtesy to CC me (e.g. by CCing #583183, not mailing just to control): was stealthy, rude. Maybe the "mass filed bugs" had a reason to be closed, but not #583183 itself. Seems that #584066 was merged with #583183 as per http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=9;bug=584066 (which is reasonable); then when #584066 was closed (as above), it closed #583183 instead: surely unintended, wrong. > ... I suggest you ask for elaboration ... Sadly, many of those people are not nice enough to respond. > ... or try read the nice documentation at > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ which I believe covers e.g. mass-filing. I do try to keep up. (Not much time left after useless arguments...) Cheers, Paul Paul Szabo p...@maths.usyd.edu.au http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/ School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Australia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
