It appears that the testing version of ghemical also fails to build with the current C++ toolchain, at least on alpha (though with a different error):
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/devel/release/ghemical-1.01/src/graphics' alpha-linux-gnu-g++ -c -g -O2 -fno-exceptions -I../../src/graphics -I../../src/common -I/usr/include/openbabel -I/home/devel/release/ghemical-1.01/src -I/usr/include/sc -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/include/gnome-1.0 -DNEED_GNOMESUPPORT_H -I/usr/lib/gnome-libs/include -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include ./mtools.cpp ./objects.h:93: error: 'obj_loc_data* dummy_object::GetLocDataRW() const' is protected ./objects.h:180: error: within this context ./views.h:233: error: variable or field 'mm1_apply_udata_as_cset' declared void ./views.h:233: error: 'mm1_docv' was not declared in this scope ./views.h:233: error: expected primary-expression before ',' token ./views.h:233: error: expected primary-expression before 'void' ./views.h:233: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression make[2]: *** [mtools.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/devel/release/ghemical-1.01/src/graphics' The code that causes the build failure in unstable doesn't seem to be present in ghemical 1.01, which is what I was checking for, but the package does nevertheless fail to build, which is a serious bug. I didn't open a second bug for that failure, because I expect that ghemical will just be removed from testing if this bug isn't resolved soon. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
