On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:02:16 +0100, Carl Chenet wrote: > I'm a new maintainer for the python-pip package and it would be great to > solve this blocking issue.
Thanks for coming back to that issue, and we really should solve this! > What about using python-pip for the executable of the python-pip package > and using perl-pip for the executable of the pip package? To be honest: Since the perl pip is older and Ian was considering a rename to pypip [0] my hope was that we can leave the perl package as-is and the python package would first change upstream and then in Debian. (In general I see no advantage of changing two binaries in Debian.) CC'ing Ian to get an update on his point of view. Cheers, gregor [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551926#60 -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG Key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Queen: My Baby Does Me
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
